Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 5:35:59 GMT -5
Consuming has negative connotations. I'm not saying it, but the Spanish language dictionary, which, of the various meanings it includes, there are some that make it equivalent to destroying or extinguishing or discouraging, hurrying or afflicting . And, not even Don Toni Cantó can avoid this , unless this year, in addition to organizing festivals, he gets his hands on the matter. While this is happening, when we talk about consumption we are talking about something that, in order for it to have a pass, must be accompanied by some kind adjective such as responsible or sustainable. If not, you are suspected of appearing excessive or irresponsible. And, of course, worthy of being monitored to control it. Although the theme is old: meden agan (something like nothing in excess ) was inscribed on the pediment of the temple of Apollo at Delphi. Because it is also true that consuming is, according to the same dictionary, " Using food or other goods to satisfy needs or desires ", an activity that seems positive and which, however, gives rise to many associations defending consumers of goods. and services. That seems to be a sign that they think they need that defense because the suppliers of those goods and services do not adequately satisfy those needs.
Addition to these associations, there is a Ministry of Consumer Affairs. Before, it was called Health, Consumption and Social Welfare where that activity was supported by two others of an apparently more positive nature but, now, the head of Consumption, Alberto Garzón, has to deal with this bull alone, with no other activities than to throw himself into it. homework. This is Malta Phone Number what he had in the distribution of powers of the 2020 coalition government. In these circumstances, dedicating yourself to Consumption has its peculiarities, not all of them rewarding. From the outset, we must accept that the ministry has the desire to ensure social well-being, although it is not in the title of the department but, like the value of bullfighters, it must be recognized. What happens is that, like “ He who loves you well will make you cry ”, his designs are not always understood.
For example, when he says that not all the properties of ham are beneficial for the human organism or when, on more than one occasion, he makes statements that meat producers consider contrary to the consumption of that food. The last of these statements has raised eyebrows among industrial meat producers for saying that this meat is of lower quality than that of extensive livestock farming. A famous Spanish has gone from advertising industrial hamburgers for €6 to selling, in his restaurant, hamburgers, made from meat from extensive livestock farming, for €19. Anyone can understand that there is a difference between them not only in price but also in quality and, that seems to be what the minister said. But, when it comes to meat, it should be on tenterhooks, although Garzón himself knows how difficult it is to qualify statements according to which statements, especially if we take into account that one should not play with things to eat, not even if those games are florals and, even less, if there is a problem of translation into English, in addition to an inveterate habit of adjusting texts in journalistic works. For things like that, the minister is receiving a lot of criticism.
Addition to these associations, there is a Ministry of Consumer Affairs. Before, it was called Health, Consumption and Social Welfare where that activity was supported by two others of an apparently more positive nature but, now, the head of Consumption, Alberto Garzón, has to deal with this bull alone, with no other activities than to throw himself into it. homework. This is Malta Phone Number what he had in the distribution of powers of the 2020 coalition government. In these circumstances, dedicating yourself to Consumption has its peculiarities, not all of them rewarding. From the outset, we must accept that the ministry has the desire to ensure social well-being, although it is not in the title of the department but, like the value of bullfighters, it must be recognized. What happens is that, like “ He who loves you well will make you cry ”, his designs are not always understood.
For example, when he says that not all the properties of ham are beneficial for the human organism or when, on more than one occasion, he makes statements that meat producers consider contrary to the consumption of that food. The last of these statements has raised eyebrows among industrial meat producers for saying that this meat is of lower quality than that of extensive livestock farming. A famous Spanish has gone from advertising industrial hamburgers for €6 to selling, in his restaurant, hamburgers, made from meat from extensive livestock farming, for €19. Anyone can understand that there is a difference between them not only in price but also in quality and, that seems to be what the minister said. But, when it comes to meat, it should be on tenterhooks, although Garzón himself knows how difficult it is to qualify statements according to which statements, especially if we take into account that one should not play with things to eat, not even if those games are florals and, even less, if there is a problem of translation into English, in addition to an inveterate habit of adjusting texts in journalistic works. For things like that, the minister is receiving a lot of criticism.
